The CV That Was Too Polite To Get Her The Job - How to Write a CV That Gets You Noticed (Not Overlooked)

I want to tell you about a woman I'll call Sarah.

Sarah had fifteen years of experience in operations management. She'd restructured a department of forty people, delivered a cost saving programme that kept her company afloat during a particularly brutal trading period, and quietly built a team culture that people genuinely didn't want to leave. Her manager relied on her completely. Her colleagues respected her. She was, by every measure that actually matters, exceptional at her job.

Her CV said she had "supported the delivery of operational improvements" and "assisted the leadership team in implementing strategic change."

I nearly missed her entirely.

That's the thing nobody tells you about CVs. The person reading yours isn't reading it the way you wrote it — slowly, carefully, with full context. They're scanning. Pattern matching. Making a decision in seconds about whether this person sounds like someone things happen to, or someone who makes things happen. And when the language is passive, when the verbs are soft, when every achievement has been quietly hedged and credited outward — that decision gets made fast, and it rarely goes the right way.

Sarah got through, eventually. But it took longer than it should have. And she nearly didn't apply at all, because she'd looked at the job description and talked herself out of it twice before a colleague pushed her to send the application.

I've thought about Sarah a lot over the years. Because she isn't unusual. She is, in my experience, the rule rather than the exception.

The Language Women Use On Their CVs — And Where It Comes From

Spend twenty years in recruitment and you start to notice patterns that nobody really talks about in polite company.

One of the clearest ones is this: mid career women, on the whole, write CVs that are far too modest for the careers they've actually had.

Not because they lack experience. Not because they haven't done extraordinary things. But because at some point — in a performance review, a meeting, a corridor conversation with a manager, or simply through years of absorbing what was and wasn't rewarded around them — they learned that owning their contribution too directly wasn't a great look.

So they soften it.

Supported instead of led. Assisted instead of drove. Contributed to instead of delivered. Helped facilitate instead of built from scratch.

The language shrinks, and with it, so does the impression of the person on the page.

What's insidious about this is that it doesn't feel like shrinking when you're doing it. It feels like accuracy. It feels like not overclaiming. It feels, often, like the professionally appropriate thing to do — because ambiguity about whose credit it really was, or who else was involved, or whether 'led' is slightly too strong a word for what technically happened — that ambiguity has been used against women often enough that they learn to pre-empt it.

The result is a CV that is scrupulously, painfully fair — and professionally devastating.

What The CV Next To Yours Looks Like

Here is an uncomfortable truth from inside the hiring process.

The CV sitting next to yours — from someone with less experience, fewer years, perhaps a fraction of the track record you've quietly accumulated — is almost certainly written like a declaration. Bold verbs. Owned outcomes. No apology for taking up space on the page.

And I already know which one most hiring managers will read differently.

This is not about arrogance. The bolder CV is not necessarily more accurate. It is not written by someone who genuinely did more or deserves more. It is written by someone who has not yet been taught to doubt whether their contribution was really theirs to claim.

That's the gap. Not experience. Not capability. Not even confidence in the room — that can come later. It's the quiet, learned belief that making yourself too visible on paper is somehow unprofessional. That good work should speak for itself. That the right people will see it.

They won't. Not if you've buried it in passive language and collective pronouns.

This Isn't A CV Problem. It's Deeper Than That.

I want to be careful here, because this is the part that matters most.

The way a woman writes her CV is not a personal failing. It is not laziness, or lack of ambition, or poor self awareness. It is the entirely predictable result of what happens when you spend years in environments that reward women for being collaborative and humble and team-focused — and then, the moment you need to advocate for yourself on paper, you discover that the same instincts that made you excellent at your job are now working against you.

It is a confidence problem that has learned to disguise itself as professionalism.

And the reason it's so hard to catch is that it feels right. It feels like you're being accurate. It feels like the version of you that doesn't overclaim and doesn't show off and doesn't make colleagues feel like you're grabbing credit that belongs to the group.

But here's what I need you to hear: there is no version of your career that gets better by continuing to make yourself smaller on the page.

You cannot shrink your way to the next level.

Where To Start

You don't need to rewrite everything at once. Start with this.

Open your CV and find every instance of the following words: supported, assisted, contributed to, helped, facilitated, involved in, worked with, participated in.

Every single one of those is a candidate for replacement.

Ask yourself: what did I actually do? Not what the team did. Not what the project achieved. What was your specific role, your specific action, your specific impact? Then write that. In the first person. With an active verb. Without the hedge.

Not "supported the delivery of a new client onboarding process" — but "redesigned the client onboarding process, reducing time to first contact by three weeks."

Not "contributed to the team's revenue growth" — but "developed the client retention strategy that contributed to a 23% increase in repeat business."

Specific. Active. Owned.

That's it. That's the whole thing.

The discomfort you feel doing this is worth examining. It's not arrogance. It's just honesty — and you are allowed to be honest about what you've built.

If this landed for you, The Bloom is my weekly newsletter where I write about the stuff that actually happens in careers — the hidden dynamics, the unspoken rules, and the practical things that make a real difference. No generic career advice. No motivational fluff. Just straight talk from someone still inside the industry.

You can sign up below.